Congress, govt clash on Twitter over tribal rights under new forestry rules | India News
“The allegation is an ill-informed attempt to show that the Rules do not care about the provisions of other laws. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government remains committed to protecting the rights of Adivasis (tribal people),’ Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav tweeted while responding to Congress leader Jairam Ramesh’s accusations against the government over changed rules.
The Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2022 are reform-minded with the aim of streamlining the approval process under t… https://t.co/7qAh5TvL4m
— Bhupender Yadav (@byadavbjp) 1657450064000
On the key point and bone of contention where the Congress leader accused the government of watering down gram sabha rights by giving consent to projects before green clearance, Yadav said: “You are trying to insinuate a problem where none exist There is no dilution of FRA provisions as being misinterpreted since compliance with and compliance with FRA 2006 is specifically mentioned in the Rules before the State issues diversion orders.
“It is very much there and well supported under the provisions of the respective laws. The achievement and compliance of FRA 2006 is an independent process, which can be done at any stage by the States, but must be completed before granting approval for land diversion I’m afraid we can’t see a point if we decide not to… I’ll rest my case on that.
It all started when Ramesh, a former environment minister, posted a one-page note on Twitter, highlighting how state governments will come under even greater pressure from the Center to speed up the land diversion process. forests to the detriment of land and livelihoods. rights of tribal peoples and other families living in the country’s forest areas.
He also pointed out that the new rules were enacted without any consultation or discussion with stakeholders, including Parliamentof the Standing Committee on Environment and Forestry, and stated that the issue/amendments would be challenged at the next session.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi also took to the microblogging site to flag the issue, tweeting: “Modi-Mitr’ Sarkar to his best mate! UPA Forest Rights Act 2006. Congress strongly supports our Adivasi brothers and sisters in their fight to protect Jal, Jungle and Zameen. »
‘Modi-Mitr’ Sarkar to his best friend!
—Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) 1657446752000
Although Yadav in his detailed memo, posted in response to Ramesh’s tweets and allegations, clarified all the points and stressed that no rule or provision of any act is diluted and the process has been streamlined to reduce delays Coming to the final decision, Ramesh asked him not to “evade the main question” and wondered if his government was making the “Gram Sabha” irrelevant? “You may not have been informed properly. Your new rules go against the 2015 memo from the Ministry of Tribal Affairs…” Ramesh tweeted.
Mantri-ji, please don’t evade the main issue, that is, don’t you make the Gram Sabha irrelevant? You may not have… https://t.co/gfsJmgrUBs
— Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) 1657455913000
Tribal Affairs Minister Arjun Munda, however, tried to link the issue to “the fact that the NDA presidential candidate is a tribal woman”.
“…The allegation that the current government is trying to wrest tribal rights has no basis and is a vain attempt to distract from the fact that the NDA presidential candidate is a tribal woman,” he tweeted.
It is a great misfortune that for the past 75 years when the Congress party has never thought of having a tribal… https://t.co/G1bp89sDr6
— Arjun Munda (@MundaArjun) 1657462898000